Steel erection — Level 2
Illustrative interface — example data
- Operative A Steel fixer Signed 07:46
- Operative B Steel fixer Acknowledged 07:52
- Operative C Banksman Viewed 08:04
- Operative D Plant operator Issued 07:31
Sheet 02 / 01 — RAMS
A method statement only does its job when the people carrying out the task have actually seen it. Built Still supports getting it to them, recording that they acknowledged it, and keeping that record.
Sheet 02 / 01 — A
Everything below concerns distribution, acknowledgement and record keeping. None of it concerns writing, approving or validating the document itself.
Prepared RAMS documents issued to the people who need them, rather than left in a folder nobody on site opens.
The right document reaching the right working party for the task in front of them.
A recorded confirmation that a person was issued with the document and acknowledged it.
Where digital sign-off forms part of the agreed workflow, the signing step is captured against the same record.
The issue, the acknowledgements and the outcome retained together in a consistent structure.
Notes and photographs that relate to the work can be associated with the record.
When a document is revised, the revision can be issued again so acknowledgement is against the current version.
Who has not yet acknowledged, shown plainly rather than buried in a report.
RAMS workflow
Sheet 02 / 01 — B
A method statement sitting in an office folder is not reaching the operative on Level 2. Built Still is designed to move that document to the people carrying out the task, and to keep a record of who acknowledged it.
RAMS workflow
Illustrative interface — example data

Sheet 02 / 01 — C
This matters more than any feature list. RAMS carry real legal weight, and software cannot take that on.
There is no document generation. A RAMS document must be prepared by a competent person before it is issued through the platform.
The platform makes no assessment of whether a document is suitable, sufficient or legally adequate for the work.
Preparation, review, approval and supervision remain with appropriately competent people in the business.
Built Still can support the RAMS process but cannot determine whether a RAMS document is suitable, sufficient, legally compliant or appropriate to the specific work without competent professional review.


Next step
Tell us how method statements are currently prepared, issued and acknowledged in your business, and where that process tends to break down.
Notice 01 / Cookies
We use essential cookies to make this website work. With your consent we would also use analytics cookies to understand how the site is used. No analytics are loaded until you accept. See our Cookie Policy.